Mexico's democratic disaster
As a lawyer from Mexico, I see the democratic backsliding in my country as not just an academic or professional concern—it's deeply personal. Recent constitutional reforms threaten Mexico's democracy by dismantling the few checks and balances left. The amendments, commonly known as "Plan C," will replace all federal and state judges with those elected by popular vote. These changes violate international human rights standards and will significantly compromise judicial independence.
This issue hits close to home for me as I have worked in public interest litigation, and my research focuses on access to justice. Outgoing Mexican President López Obrador claims these reforms will eradicate corruption and improve access to justice. The reality, however, is far different. These reforms are about capturing the judiciary rather than delivering justice. They undermine judicial independence, threaten to politicize rulings and weaken the protection of fundamental rights.
Co-authoring this Journal of Democracy article with Stanford Law Professor and SLS Rule of Law Impact Lab Executive Director Amrit Singh has allowed me to voice my concerns about "Plan C" and stress its consequences. I hope this article serves as a call to action for all who care about justice, democracy, and the rule of law. Mexico is at a crossroads between authoritarianism and democracy; it is time to act.
The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent the Stanford Law School Rule of Law Impact Lab.
Gianmarco Coronado Graci (2023 cohort) is a Knight-Hennessy scholar pursuing a master of the science of law degree in International Legal Studies and Stanford Law School, and a Master of Public Policy degree in the Stanford School of Humanities and Science. Gianmarco is passionate about constitutional law; throughout his legal career, he has focused on a range of issues, including access to health, transparency, free speech, anti-corruption, and discrimination.
Knight-Hennessy scholars represent a vast array of cultures, perspectives, and experiences. While we as an organization are committed to elevating their voices, the views expressed are those of the scholars, and not necessarily those of KHS.
